Ace Your C++ Skills 2025 – Rock the ‘Thinking in C++’ Challenge!

Question: 1 / 565

For a class 'Integer', what is the correct definition for overloading the unary '-' operator as a global function?

Integer operator-(const Integer&);

const Integer operator-(const Integer&);

The options A, C, and D are incorrect because they do not specify that the return type should be a constant Integer object. In order to correctly overload the unary '-' operator as a global function for the 'Integer' class, the return type must be explicitly declared as const Integer. This allows for the returned value to be used in expressions without causing any unintended changes to the original object. Additionally, option D is incorrect because it should not take in an Integer object as a parameter, since the operator is being overloaded as a global function and not a member function. Overall, option B is the best choice for correctly defining the unary '-' operator as a global function for the 'Integer' class.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

const Integer& operator-(const Integer& a);

Integer& operator-(Integer a);

Next Question

Report this question

Download Ace Your C++ Skills 2025 – Rock the ‘Thinking in C++’ Challenge! PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy